In some cases, it might be beneficial to go with more modest hardware if the time-to-render isn’t of a great concern in other cases, spending more on faster hardware might actually save you money in the long-run.įor our rendering tests, we use Autodesk’s 3ds Max (2015, for SPECapc, and 2017, for our real-world model render), the popular open source design suite Blender, as well as Cinebench and POV-Ray for some quick-and-dirty results.Īll of the tests here are hugely scalable, and will remain so for the forseeable future. AMD presented a multi-threaded Cinebench benchmark showing a 46 gain over the four-core Core i7-7700K. With these results, it’s up to you to gauge where the best value can be found. It comes with a 3.0GHz base and 3.7GHz boost frequency along with 20MB of L2+元 cache. 3850 MHz across all cores appears stable 1.41 vcore. Passes Intel Burn Test (10 passes) & Cinebench.
On a low-end system, a production render might take hours, for example, whereas on a high-end system, that render could be shaved down to the tens of minutes. Ryzen 1700X Noctua 12S cooler Asus X370 Prime mobo G.Skill Ripjaws 32GB (2 DIMMs) running at 2933 Plextor MP8e 1TB NVMe SSD Geforce 1080 Ti And some other sht So far, here are my results: 3800 MHz across all cores stable 1.4 vcore. CINEBENCH is based on MAXON's animation software.
(All of our tests are explained in detail on page 2.)ĭesign and rendering is one of the greatest areas of computing to benchmark to highlight the benefits of faster hardware, whether it be a CPU, GPU, memory, and even storage. Processor performance: CineBench 11.5 CINEBENCH is a real-world cross platform test suite that evaluates your computer's performance capabilities.
0 kommentar(er)
